imported>KennethBaclawski: Fix PurpleMediaWiki references

2016-01-09T07:46:38Z

Fix PurpleMediaWiki references

New page

= ONTOLOG Community & Project Planning Worskhop 2005 =

* Session Date: Thu 2005.03.03
* Facilitator: [[KurtConrad|Kurt Conrad]]
* First session page: ConferenceCall_2005_03_03

== Resources ==

* Last Year's Planning Workshop Results - see: OntologPlanning_2004

== Participant Input ==

* review / update Community Charter (--PeterYim / 2005.02.28)
** Ref: proposed updated charter - see: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/2005-02/msg00020.html

* adopt a definition for Formal & Informal Ontologies
** Ref: thread initiated by [[DuaneNickull|Duane Nickull]], and responses from [[PeterYim|Peter P. Yim]] & [[LeoObrst|Leo Obrst]] - see: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum//ontolog-forum/2005-03/msg00005.html

== Session Agenda & Proceeding ==

* '''Work Session 2005.04.14''' - [[KurtConrad|Kurt Conrad]], [[BobSmith|Bob Smith]] & [[PeterYim|Peter P. Yim]]
** Kurt: our problem is that community members engage at levels they choose, planning has nothing to do with traction
** Peter: we've got [[CoP]] activities (casual) and Project Activities (disciplined); if the latter is funded, then we can better reinforce the discipline
** Kurt-Bob-Peter: 6 buckets
*** [[CoP]] activities
*** experimental/evangelistic projects
*** discplined projects
*** project infrastructure
*** [[CoP]] infrastructure
*** Other
** Kurt's table: Issue or Activities - Source - Buckets(6) - Priority - Dependencies - Resources - Level of Interest
*** Priority & Level of Interest: 1 ~ 5, 5 being high
*** Resources: in terms of getting enough resources to pull the activity off
** Action Items
*** Have an ontology of project planning. Who we are, opportunities, constraints   
*** Sustainability of [[CoP]], as a whole   
*** Continue technology transfer, help people "sell" ontology approach   
*** extend SUMO (from Adam's: Do real work that gets used by somebody, especially UBL focus, concrete results   )
**** continue from here - more 'real work' going on yet
*** develop a robust semantic policy decision making framework
*** validating planning team's ranking through a survey
** Next work Session 2005.05.05 right after the regular call - [[KurtConrad|Kurt Conrad]], [[BobSmith|Bob Smith]], [[PeterYim|Peter P. Yim]] & [[LeoObrst|Leo Obrst]]

* '''Work Session 2005.06.09''' - [[KurtConrad|Kurt Conrad]], [[BobSmith|Bob Smith]] & [[PeterYim|Peter P. Yim]]
** Current Priorities
*** Meeting time
**** NIST: Monday, Wednesday, Friday
**** Conflicts w/ W3C Semantic Web Best Practices meeting
**** What are the competing organizations and their meeting times?
**** Drives importance of an updated membership survey. Who would join us if we changed our time? Who would drop out if we change the time? Iterate 3-4x.
**** Not an actionable issue, at this time.
*** Metrics (how many show depending on agenda)
*** Governance
**** Annual budget target for sustained operations (financial and non-financial resources)
**** Assigned roles and responsibilities
**** Structures to support "commercial" activities and committments
*** Team Roster
**** Current XML-based roster is too labor intensive to continue
**** Need alternative approach
** Resourcing considerations
*** Colab engages individuals as part of job duties (Federal or contractor)
*** Ontolog primarily resourced by non-funded labor (tend to see participation drop off as commercial activities increase)
** Meeting schedule
*** Alternative weeks vs non-event days: Try every two weeks until a better option presents itself

[[Category:WorkSpace]]

OntologPlanning 2005 - Revision history

imported>KennethBaclawski: Fix PurpleMediaWiki references