imported>KennethBaclawski: Fix PurpleMediaWiki references

2016-01-09T08:02:38Z

Fix PurpleMediaWiki references

New page

= [[OntologySummit2007|Ontology Summit 2007]]: [[OntologySummit2007_Survey]] individual responses =

== [[OntologySummit2007_Survey/Response]] input from [[MichelBiezunski|Michel Biezunski]] ==

'''''Please make sure you refer to the [[OntologySummit2007|Ontology Summit 2007]] & [[OntologySummit2007_Survey]] pages for the full context of the input.   '''''

----

Question 1 Respondant Info

Name: Michel Biezunski

Question 2 Affiliated -
I am affiliated with the following constituencies/communities (please check all that apply)

[ ] Formal ontology communities

[X] Semantic Web communities

[ ] Linguistic communities

[ ] Concept Map community

[X] Topic Map community

[ ] SEARCH communities

[ ] Web 2.0 communities

[ ] Thesauri community

[ ] Taxonomy communities

[ ] Metadata communities

[X] XML communities

[ ] Applications Development, Software Engineering and Information Model communities

[X] System Architecture communities

[ ] Biomedical communities

[X] Standards Development communities

[ ] Other (please specify): (Not Answered)

Question 2a Representing -
I represent the perspective of the following constituency/community (please pick one; if you want to provide input from more than one perspective, please return a separate form):

[ ] 1. Formal ontology communities

[ ] 2. Semantic Web communities

[ ] 3. Linguistic communities

[ ] 4. Concept Map community

[ ] 5. Topic Map community

[ ] 6. SEARCH communities

[ ] 7. Web 2.0 communities

[ ] 8. Thesauri community

[ ] 9. Taxonomy communities

[ ] 10. Metadata communities

[ ] 11. XML communities

[ ] 12. Applications Development, Software Engineering and Information Model communities

[X] 13. System Architecture communities

[ ] 14. Biomedical communities

[ ] 15. Standards Development communities

[ ] 16. Other (please specify): (Not Answered)

Question 2b Specific Community

or sub-community I am affiliated with: I am looking for it.

Question 2c Expertise Self Assessment -
With respect to the perspective you are representing and providing input from, I am a/an:

[ ] 1. informed layman

[ ] 2. practitioner

[X] 3. expert

[ ] 4. other (please specify): (Not Answered)

Question 3a Ontology Value -

"A common set of terms and processing rules."

Question 3b Ontology Issues -

"Defining the level to which it is operational, i.e. whether it embraces

the rest or if it is embraced by it. Ontology is only one specific

point of view. Degree of Agreement evolves over time."

Question 3c Ontology Problems -

"Try to elucidate the divergence between the meaning of "ontology"

in the philosophical sense ("the science of being") which conveys

the notion of absolute and the computer-science sense

('an exhaustive conceptual schema') which tends to impose the

misleading view that there is no other way to conceptualize.

An ontology should be seen as a particular world view."

Question 3d Corresponding Solutions -

"Decompose in a common low level representation, and recompose

several views (=ontologies). This is equivalent to decompose

operations in assembly language, and recompose them according

to different high level languages."

Question 4aGlossary -
Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community:

Term: Subject

Gloss: An understanding of a thing.

Reference (citation/url): (Not Answered)

Artifact (name/version): (Not Answered)

- Artifact Ref. (url): (Not Answered)

Question 4a1 Called An Ontology -
On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community?

[ ] 1. 1 - totally unlikely

[ ] 2. 2 - rarely

[X] 3. 3 - sometimes

[ ] 4. 4 - quite often

[ ] 5. 5 - almost always

Question 4a2 Additional Remarks -

"(Not Answered)"

Question 4bGlossary -
Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community:

Term: Topic

Gloss: An expression of a subject

Reference (citation/url): (Not Answered)

Artifact (name/version): <topic> element in Topic Maps. Subject / Object in RDF

- Artifact Ref. (url): (Not Answered)

Question 4b1 Called An Ontology -
On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community?

[ ] 1. 1 - totally unlikely

[ ] 2. 2 - rarely

[ ] 3. 3 - sometimes

[X] 4. 4 - quite often

[ ] 5. 5 - almost always

Question 4b2 Additional Remarks -

"(Not Answered)"

Question 4cGlossary -
Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community:

Term: Name

Gloss: A string attached to a subject. Subjects may have zero, one or several names.

Reference (citation/url): (Not Answered)

Artifact (name/version): (Not Answered)

- Artifact Ref. (url): (Not Answered)

Question 4c1 Called An Ontology -
On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community?

[ ] 1. 1 - totally unlikely

[ ] 2. 2 - rarely

[ ] 3. 3 - sometimes

[ ] 4. 4 - quite often

[X] 5. 5 - almost always

Question 4c2 Additional Remarks -

"(Not Answered)"

Question 4dGlossary -
Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community:

Term: Identifier

Gloss: A string that uniquely designates a subject. A formal expression of a subject.

Reference (citation/url): (Not Answered)

Artifact (name/version): A key in a database.

- Artifact Ref. (url): (Not Answered)

Question 4d1 Called An Ontology -
On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community?

[ ] 1. 1 - totally unlikely

[ ] 2. 2 - rarely

[ ] 3. 3 - sometimes

[X] 4. 4 - quite often

[ ] 5. 5 - almost always

Question 4d2 Additional Remarks -

"(Not Answered)"

Question 4eGlossary -
Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community:

Term: Perspective

Gloss: A bias in which a universe is seen that determines

the expressions that are uttered to express it.

Reference (citation/url): (Not Answered)

Artifact (name/version): (Not Answered)

- Artifact Ref. (url): (Not Answered)

Question 4e1 Called An Ontology -
On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community?

[ ] 1. 1 - totally unlikely

[ ] 2. 2 - rarely

[ ] 3. 3 - sometimes

[ ] 4. 4 - quite often

[X] 5. 5 - almost always

Question 4e2 Additional Remarks -

"(Not Answered)"

Question 4fGlossary -
Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community:

Term: View

Gloss: A set of expressions treated as a unit.

Reference (citation/url): (Not Answered)

Artifact (name/version): (Not Answered)

- Artifact Ref. (url): (Not Answered)

Question 4f1 Called An Ontology -
On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community?

[ ] 1. 1 - totally unlikely

[ ] 2. 2 - rarely

[X] 3. 3 - sometimes

[ ] 4. 4 - quite often

[ ] 5. 5 - almost always

Question 4f2 Additional Remarks -

"(Not Answered)"

Question 4gGlossary -
Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community:

Term: Monad

Gloss (definition): A simple substance that enters into composites

Reference (citation/url): G.W. Leibniz. Monadology,

1. [ G.W. Leibniz's Monadology, by Nicholas Rescher,

University of Pittsburgh Press, 1991]

Artifact (name/version): (Not Answered)

- Artifact Ref. (url): (Not Answered)

Question 4g1 Called An Ontology -
On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community?

[ ] 1. 1 - totally unlikely

[X] 2. 2 - rarely

[ ] 3. 3 - sometimes

[ ] 4. 4 - quite often

[ ] 5. 5 - almost always

Question 4g2 Additional Remarks -

"(Not Answered)"

Question 4hGlossary -
Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community:

Term: Entelechy

Gloss: One could give the name "entelechies" to all simple substances

or created monads. For they all have in them a certain perfection

[echousi to enteles], there is a certain self-sufficiency [autarkeia]

that makes them sources of their own internal actions...

Reference (citation/url): G.W. Leibniz. Monadology, 18.

[ G.W. Leibniz's Monadology, by Nicholas Rescher,

University of Pittsburgh Press, 1991]

Artifact (name/version): (Not Answered)

- Artifact Ref. (url): (Not Answered)

Question 4h1 Called An Ontology -
On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community?

[X] 1. 1 - totally unlikely

[ ] 2. 2 - rarely

[ ] 3. 3 - sometimes

[ ] 4. 4 - quite often

[ ] 5. 5 - almost always

Question 4h2 Additional Remarks -

"(Not Answered)"

Question 5 Confirm Participation - where,

a 'convener' is a participant who provides substantive contribution to the [[OntologySummit2007|Ontology Summit 2007]]

initiative (through the online discourse, this survey, and other events leading to or during

the workshops and the written communique process), and

a 'co-sponsor' is an organization who is providing technical or funding support (e.g. supporting

member(s) of its technical staff to participate as a 'convener'), and/or endorsing the objective

of this [[OntologySummit2007|Ontology Summit 2007]],

[ ] I agree that my name can be listed as a 'convener' of [[OntologySummit2007|Ontology Summit 2007]]

[ ] I will consider endorsing the [[OntologySummit2007|Ontology Summit 2007]] communique. Please send it to me for

review when it is ready. I will confirm my endorsement after the review.

[ ] I confirm that you may list my organization as a 'co-sponsor' for

[[OntologySummit2007|Ontology Summit 2007]] (details below).

Question 5a Co-Sponsor confirmation:

Organization Name: (Not Answered)

Link (url) to Logo: (Not Answered)

----

[[Category:WorkSpace]] [[Category:OntologySummit]] [[Category:OntologySummit2007]]

OntologySummit2007 Survey/MichelBiezunski - Revision history

imported>KennethBaclawski: Fix PurpleMediaWiki references