View source for OntologySummit2007 Survey/TedGoranson

= [[OntologySummit2007|Ontology Summit 2007]]: [[OntologySummit2007_Survey]] individual responses  =

== [[OntologySummit2007_Survey/Response]] input from TedGoranson  ==

'''''Please make sure you refer to the [[OntologySummit2007|Ontology Summit 2007]] &amp; [[OntologySummit2007_Survey]] pages for the full context of the input. &nbsp;&nbsp;''''' 

----

Question 1 Respondant Info 

Name:  Ted Goranson 

Question 2 Affiliated - 
I am affiliated with the following constituencies/communities  (please check all that apply) 

[  ]  Formal ontology communities

[  ]  Semantic Web communities

[  ]  Linguistic communities

[  ]  Concept Map community

[  ]  Topic Map community

[  ]  SEARCH communities

[  ]  Web 2.0 communities

[  ]  Thesauri community

[  ]  Taxonomy communities

[  ]  Metadata communities

[  ]  XML communities

[  ]  Applications Development, Software Engineering and Information Model communities

[  ]  System Architecture communities

[  ]  Biomedical communities

[  ]  Standards Development communities

[  ]  Other (please specify):  (Not Answered) 

Question 2a Representing - 
I represent the perspective of the following constituency/community (please pick one; if you want to provide input from more than one perspective, please return a separate form): 

[  ]  1. Formal ontology communities

[  ]  2. Semantic Web communities

[  ]  3. Linguistic communities

[  ]  4. Concept Map community

[  ]  5. Topic Map community

[  ]  6. SEARCH communities

[  ]  7. Web 2.0 communities

[  ]  8. Thesauri community

[  ]  9. Taxonomy communities

[  ]  10. Metadata communities

[  ]  11. XML communities

[  ]  12. Applications Development, Software Engineering and Information Model communities

[  ]  13. System Architecture communities

[  ]  14. Biomedical communities

[  ]  15. Standards Development communities

[X]  16. Other (please specify):  Upper and State 

Question 2b Specific Community 

or sub-community I am affiliated with:  Situated Intelligence and State 

Question 2c Expertise Self Assessment - 
With respect to the perspective you are representing and providing input from, I am a/an: 

[  ]  1. informed layman

[  ]  2. practitioner

[X]  3. expert

[  ]  4. other (please specify):  (Not Answered) 

Question 3a Ontology Value - 

"Intelligence fusion" 

Question 3b Ontology Issues - 

"In my case, it is simply lack of time. The state of the art is not sufficient for 

our deep needs, but IKRIS/PSL solves a good bit and we don't have that yet because 

of the mechanics of collaboration." 

Question 3c Ontology Problems - 

"(Not Answered)" 

Question 3d Corresponding Solutions - 

"(Not Answered)" 

Question 4aGlossary - 
Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community: 

Term:  (Not Answered)

Gloss:  (Not Answered)

Reference (citation/url):  (Not Answered)

Artifact (name/version):  (Not Answered)

- Artifact Ref. (url):  (Not Answered) 

Question 4a1 Called An Ontology - 
On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community? 

[  ]  1. 1 - totally unlikely

[  ]  2. 2 - rarely

[  ]  3. 3 - sometimes

[  ]  4. 4 - quite often

[X]  5. 5 - almost always 

Question 4a2 Additional Remarks - 

"(Not Answered)" 

Question 4bGlossary - 
Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community: 

Term:  (Not Answered)

Gloss:  (Not Answered)

Reference (citation/url):  (Not Answered)

Artifact (name/version):  (Not Answered)

- Artifact Ref. (url):  (Not Answered) 

Question 4b1 Called An Ontology - 
On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community? 

[  ]  1. 1 - totally unlikely

[  ]  2. 2 - rarely

[  ]  3. 3 - sometimes

[  ]  4. 4 - quite often

[X]  5. 5 - almost always 

Question 4b2 Additional Remarks - 

"(Not Answered)" 

Question 4cGlossary - 
Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community: 

Term:  (Not Answered)

Gloss:  (Not Answered)

Reference (citation/url):  (Not Answered)

Artifact (name/version):  (Not Answered)

- Artifact Ref. (url):  (Not Answered) 

Question 4c1 Called An Ontology - 
On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community? 

[  ]  1. 1 - totally unlikely

[  ]  2. 2 - rarely

[  ]  3. 3 - sometimes

[  ]  4. 4 - quite often

[X]  5. 5 - almost always 

Question 4c2 Additional Remarks - 

"(Not Answered)" 

Question 4dGlossary - 
Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community: 

Term:  (Not Answered)

Gloss:  (Not Answered)

Reference (citation/url):  (Not Answered)

Artifact (name/version):  (Not Answered)

- Artifact Ref. (url):  (Not Answered) 

Question 4d1 Called An Ontology - 
On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community? 

[  ]  1. 1 - totally unlikely

[  ]  2. 2 - rarely

[  ]  3. 3 - sometimes

[  ]  4. 4 - quite often

[X]  5. 5 - almost always 

Question 4d2 Additional Remarks - 

"(Not Answered)" 

Question 4eGlossary - 
Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community: 

Term:  (Not Answered)

Gloss:  (Not Answered)

Reference (citation/url):  (Not Answered)

Artifact (name/version):  (Not Answered)

- Artifact Ref. (url):  (Not Answered) 

Question 4e1 Called An Ontology - 
On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community? 

[  ]  1. 1 - totally unlikely

[  ]  2. 2 - rarely

[  ]  3. 3 - sometimes

[  ]  4. 4 - quite often

[  ]  5. 5 - almost always 

Question 4e2 Additional Remarks - 

"(Not Answered)" 

Question 4fGlossary - 
Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community: 

Term:  (Not Answered)

Gloss:  (Not Answered)

Reference (citation/url):  (Not Answered)

Artifact (name/version):  (Not Answered)

- Artifact Ref. (url):  (Not Answered) 

Question 4f1 Called An Ontology - 
On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community? 

[  ]  1. 1 - totally unlikely

[  ]  2. 2 - rarely

[  ]  3. 3 - sometimes

[  ]  4. 4 - quite often

[  ]  5. 5 - almost always 

Question 4f2 Additional Remarks - 

"(Not Answered)" 

Question 4gGlossary - 
Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community: 

Term:  (Not Answered)

Gloss (definition):  (Not Answered)

Reference (citation/url):  (Not Answered)

Artifact (name/version):  (Not Answered)

- Artifact Ref. (url):  (Not Answered) 

Question 4g1 Called An Ontology - 
On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community? 

[  ]  1. 1 - totally unlikely

[  ]  2. 2 - rarely

[  ]  3. 3 - sometimes

[  ]  4. 4 - quite often

[X]  5. 5 - almost always 

Question 4g2 Additional Remarks - 

"(Not Answered)" 

Question 4hGlossary - 
Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community: 

Term:  (Not Answered)

Gloss:  (Not Answered)

Reference (citation/url):  (Not Answered)

Artifact (name/version):  (Not Answered)

- Artifact Ref. (url):  (Not Answered) 

Question 4h1 Called An Ontology - 
On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community? 

[  ]  1. 1 - totally unlikely

[  ]  2. 2 - rarely

[  ]  3. 3 - sometimes

[  ]  4. 4 - quite often

[X]  5. 5 - almost always 

Question 4h2 Additional Remarks - 

"(Not Answered)" 

Question 5 Confirm Participation - where, 

a 'convener' is a participant who provides substantive contribution to the [[OntologySummit2007|Ontology Summit 2007]] 

initiative (through the online discourse, this survey, and other events leading to or during 

the workshops and the written communique process), and 

a 'co-sponsor' is an organization who is providing technical or funding support (e.g. supporting 

member(s) of its technical staff to participate as a 'convener'), and/or endorsing the objective 

of this [[OntologySummit2007|Ontology Summit 2007]], 

[  ]  I agree that my name can be listed as a 'convener' of [[OntologySummit2007|Ontology Summit 2007]]

[  ]  I will consider endorsing the [[OntologySummit2007|Ontology Summit 2007]] communique. Please send it to me for 

review when it is ready. I will confirm my endorsement after the review.

[  ]  I confirm that you may list my organization as a 'co-sponsor' for [[OntologySummit2007|Ontology Summit 2007]] (details below). 

Question 5a Co-Sponsor confirmation: 

Organization Name:  (Not Answered)

Link (url) to Logo:  (Not Answered) 

----





[[Category:WorkSpace]]    [[Category:OntologySummit]]    [[Category:OntologySummit2007]]