Actions

Ontolog Forum

OntologySummit2007: OntologySummit2007_Survey individual responses

OntologySummit2007_Survey/Response input from Ed Dodds


Question 1 Respondant Info

Name:  Ed Dodds 

Question 2 Affiliated - I am affiliated with the following constituencies/communities (please check all that apply)

[   ]  Formal ontology communities
[ x ]  Semantic Web communities
[   ]  Linguistic communities
[   ]  Concept Map community
[   ]  Topic Map community
[   ]  [[SEARCH]] communities
[ x ]  Web 2.0 communities
[   ]  Thesauri community
[ x ]  Taxonomy communities
[ x ]  Metadata communities
[ x ]  XML communities
[ x ]  Applications Development, Software Engineering and Information Model communities
[ x ]  System Architecture communities
[ x ]  Biomedical communities
[ x ]  Standards Development communities
[ x ]  Other (please specify):  Medical Banking Real-Time Adjudication 

Question 2a Representing - I represent the perspective of the following constituency/community (please pick one; if you want to provide input from more than one perspective, please return a separate form):

[   ]  1. Formal ontology communities
[   ]  2. Semantic Web communities
[   ]  3. Linguistic communities
[   ]  4. Concept Map community
[   ]  5. Topic Map community
[   ]  6. [[SEARCH]] communities
[   ]  7. Web 2.0 communities
[   ]  8. Thesauri community
[   ]  9. Taxonomy communities
[   ]  10. Metadata communities
[   ]  11. XML communities
[   ]  12. Applications Development, Software Engineering and Information Model communities
[   ]  13. System Architecture communities
[ X ]  14. Biomedical communities
[   ]  15. Standards Development communities
[   ]  16. Other (please specify):  (Not Answered) 

Question 2b Specific Community

or sub-community I am affiliated with:  (Not Answered) 

Question 2c Expertise Self Assessment - With respect to the perspective you are representing and providing input from, I am a/an:

[ x ]  1. informed layman
[   ]  2. practitioner
[   ]  3. expert
[   ]  4. other (please specify):  (Not Answered) 

Question 3a Ontology Value -

"(Not Answered)" 

Question 3b Ontology Issues -

"(Not Answered)" 

Question 3c Ontology Problems -

"(Not Answered)" 

Question 3d Corresponding Solutions -

"(Not Answered)" 

Question 4aGlossary - Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community:

Term:  (Not Answered)
Gloss:  (Not Answered)
Reference (citation/url):  (Not Answered)
Artifact (name/version):  CAQH CORE Rules
- Artifact Ref. (url):  http://www.caqh.org/benefits.php 

Question 4a1 Called An Ontology - On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community?

[  ]  1. 1 - totally unlikely
[  ]  2. 2 - rarely
[  ]  3. 3 - sometimes
[  ]  4. 4 - quite often
[  ]  5. 5 - almost always 

Question 4a2 Additional Remarks - {

Question 4bGlossary - Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community:

Term:  (Not Answered)
Gloss:  (Not Answered)
Reference (citation/url):  (Not Answered)
Artifact (name/version):  CORE Operating Rules
- Artifact Ref. (url):  http://www.caqh.org/CORE_phase1.php
- Artifact Ref. (url):  http://healthit.ahrq.gov/portal/server.pt/gateway/PTARGS_0_1248_227079_0_0_18/AHRQ_DataReport_final.pdf 

Question 4b1 Called An Ontology - On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community?

[  ]  1. 1 - totally unlikely
[  ]  2. 2 - rarely
[  ]  3. 3 - sometimes
[  ]  4. 4 - quite often
[  ]  5. 5 - almost always 

Question 4b2 Additional Remarks -

Question 4cGlossary - Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community:

Term:  (Not Answered)
Gloss:  (Not Answered)
Reference (citation/url):  (Not Answered)
Artifact (name/version):  (Not Answered)
- Artifact Ref. (url):  (Not Answered) 

Question 4c1 Called An Ontology - On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community?

[  ]  1. 1 - totally unlikely
[  ]  2. 2 - rarely
[  ]  3. 3 - sometimes
[  ]  4. 4 - quite often
[  ]  5. 5 - almost always 

Question 4c2 Additional Remarks -

Question 4dGlossary - Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community:

Term:  (Not Answered)
Gloss:  (Not Answered)
Reference (citation/url):  (Not Answered)
Artifact (name/version):  (Not Answered)
- Artifact Ref. (url):  (Not Answered) 

Question 4d1 Called An Ontology - On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community?

[  ]  1. 1 - totally unlikely
[  ]  2. 2 - rarely
[  ]  3. 3 - sometimes
[  ]  4. 4 - quite often
[  ]  5. 5 - almost always 

Question 4d2 Additional Remarks -

"(Not Answered)" 

Question 4eGlossary - Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community:

Term:  (Not Answered)
Gloss:  (Not Answered)
Reference (citation/url):  (Not Answered)
Artifact (name/version):  (Not Answered)
- Artifact Ref. (url):  (Not Answered) 

Question 4e1 Called An Ontology - On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community?

[  ]  1. 1 - totally unlikely
[  ]  2. 2 - rarely
[  ]  3. 3 - sometimes
[  ]  4. 4 - quite often
[  ]  5. 5 - almost always 

Question 4e2 Additional Remarks -

"(Not Answered)" 

Question 4fGlossary - Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community:

Term:  (Not Answered)
Gloss:  (Not Answered)
Reference (citation/url):  (Not Answered)
Artifact (name/version):  (Not Answered)
- Artifact Ref. (url):  (Not Answered) 

Question 4f1 Called An Ontology - On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community?

[  ]  1. 1 - totally unlikely
[  ]  2. 2 - rarely
[  ]  3. 3 - sometimes
[  ]  4. 4 - quite often
[  ]  5. 5 - almost always 

Question 4f2 Additional Remarks -

"(Not Answered)" 

Question 4gGlossary - Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community:

Term:  (Not Answered)
Gloss (definition):  (Not Answered)
Reference (citation/url):  (Not Answered)
Artifact (name/version):  (Not Answered)
- Artifact Ref. (url):  (Not Answered) 

Question 4g1 Called An Ontology - On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community?

[  ]  1. 1 - totally unlikely
[  ]  2. 2 - rarely
[  ]  3. 3 - sometimes
[  ]  4. 4 - quite often
[  ]  5. 5 - almost always 

Question 4g2 Additional Remarks -

"(Not Answered)" 

Question 4hGlossary - Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community:

Term:  (Not Answered)
Gloss:  (Not Answered)
Reference (citation/url):  (Not Answered)
Artifact (name/version):  (Not Answered)
- Artifact Ref. (url):  (Not Answered) 

Question 4h1 Called An Ontology - On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community?

[  ]  1. 1 - totally unlikely
[  ]  2. 2 - rarely
[  ]  3. 3 - sometimes
[  ]  4. 4 - quite often
[  ]  5. 5 - almost always 

Question 4h2 Additional Remarks -

"(Not Answered)" 

Question 5 Confirm Participation - where,

a 'convener' is a participant who provides substantive contribution to the [[OntologySummit2007]] 
initiative (through the online discourse, this survey, and other events leading to or during 
the workshops and the written communique process), and 
a 'co-sponsor' is an organization who is providing technical or funding support (e.g. supporting 
member(s) of its technical staff to participate as a 'convener'), and/or endorsing the objective 
of this [[OntologySummit2007]], 
[   ]  I agree that my name can be listed as a 'convener' of [[OntologySummit2007]]
[ x ]  I will consider endorsing the [[OntologySummit2007]] communique. Please send it to me for review when it is ready. I will confirm my endorsement after the review.
[   ]  I confirm that you may list my organization as a 'co-sponsor' for [[OntologySummit2007]] (details below). 

Question 5a Co-Sponsor confirmation:

Organization Name:  
Link (url) to Logo: