Actions

ConferenceCall 2026 02 18: Difference between revisions

Ontolog Forum

No edit summary
 
Line 44: Line 44:


== Discussion ==
== Discussion ==
12:15:39 Alican Tuezuen : Very interesting track, indeed<br/>
12:20:50 David EDDY - Legacy Software, Ltd. : I attach this sloping graph with Leo Obrst… whose shoulders was he standing on?<br/>
12:22:52 David EDDY - Legacy Software, Ltd. : “standard vocabularies”… ahhhhhh … the central oxymoron.<br/>
12:47:32 David EDDY - Legacy Software, Ltd. : Good stuff Todd. (I’m a SCOPE participant)<br/>
12:48:14 TS : Industrial Ontologies Foundry - https://oagi.org/pages/industrial-ontologies<br/>
12:50:10 David EDDY - Legacy Software, Ltd. : Excellent read on “industrial standards” "Philadelphia’s Philosopher Mechanics: A History of the Franklin Institute 1824 - 1865" by Bruce Sinclair<br/>
12:58:24 Roberto Rovetto : Good points Todd<br/>
12:58:33 David EDDY - Legacy Software, Ltd. : @Todd — “Analysis?!” … we’re going to jump immediately to coding… < redacted > the analysis step<br/>
13:00:56 Roberto Rovetto : To recap input: (1) need broad awareness of various ontologies (e.g. upper ones), (2) for any presentation, e.g., on university degree, the vested interest and fine-print commitment to an ontology (e.g., upper ontology product), should be explicitly stated for fairness.<br/>
13:03:41 Mike Peters : The outline of the 2026 summit is excellent. It needs to be a broad discussion that includes all viewpoints to find a working solution to the challenges facing AI. Great work<br/>
13:04:16 David EDDY - Legacy Software, Ltd. : May I safely assume things have not moved beyond “natural language” to “unnatural language?”
* e.g. last I looked there were some 450+ meanings for “cc”
* OAD offers under 12
13:06:40 Tony Cohn : Just FYI: regarding soil, I can point to one ontology: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-46547-0_4, and also  the ground has an ontology in this paper: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0198971523000546?via%3Dihub<br/>
13:07:15 TS : To be able to assess semantic interoperability systematically the SCOPE model will use the following (generic) communication paths.
* These paths include
** People -to- People using natural languages, images, sound, physical gestures or contact
** People -to- Machines: using natural languages, image, sounds or symbols translated (with potential content corruption) to (one or more) formal languages and representations
** Machines -to- Machines: using formal languages and representations, images or symbols, perhaps with translations (with potential content corruption)
** People -to- Machines -to- People: using natural languages, images, sounds or symbols to formal languages and representations, images or sounds and back to natural languages, images, sounds, or symbols with translations (with potential content corruption)
** Machines -to- People: using formal languages, image, sounds, and symbols to natural languages, images, sounds, symbols or haptic mechanisms
* David EDDY - Legacy Software, Ltd. 👍
13:08:06 David EDDY - Legacy Software, Ltd. : Thx Ken, et al<br/>
13:08:22 Phil Jackson : Thanks!<br/>
13:08:41 Jackie Csonka-Peeren : thank you!<br/>
13:08:41 Mike Peters : thanks<br/>
13:08:55 Edelweis Rohrer. : Thanks<br/>


== Resources ==
== Resources ==

Latest revision as of 01:07, 6 March 2026

Session Overview
Duration 1 hour
Date/Time 18 Feb 2026 17:00 GMT
9:00am PST/12:00pm EST
5:00pm GMT/6:00pm CET
Convener Ken Baclawski

Ontology Summit 2026 Overview

Ontologies: Past, Present, Future

Agenda

Conference Call Information

Discussion

12:15:39 Alican Tuezuen : Very interesting track, indeed
12:20:50 David EDDY - Legacy Software, Ltd. : I attach this sloping graph with Leo Obrst… whose shoulders was he standing on?
12:22:52 David EDDY - Legacy Software, Ltd. : “standard vocabularies”… ahhhhhh … the central oxymoron.
12:47:32 David EDDY - Legacy Software, Ltd. : Good stuff Todd. (I’m a SCOPE participant)
12:48:14 TS : Industrial Ontologies Foundry - https://oagi.org/pages/industrial-ontologies
12:50:10 David EDDY - Legacy Software, Ltd. : Excellent read on “industrial standards” "Philadelphia’s Philosopher Mechanics: A History of the Franklin Institute 1824 - 1865" by Bruce Sinclair
12:58:24 Roberto Rovetto : Good points Todd
12:58:33 David EDDY - Legacy Software, Ltd. : @Todd — “Analysis?!” … we’re going to jump immediately to coding… < redacted > the analysis step
13:00:56 Roberto Rovetto : To recap input: (1) need broad awareness of various ontologies (e.g. upper ones), (2) for any presentation, e.g., on university degree, the vested interest and fine-print commitment to an ontology (e.g., upper ontology product), should be explicitly stated for fairness.
13:03:41 Mike Peters : The outline of the 2026 summit is excellent. It needs to be a broad discussion that includes all viewpoints to find a working solution to the challenges facing AI. Great work
13:04:16 David EDDY - Legacy Software, Ltd. : May I safely assume things have not moved beyond “natural language” to “unnatural language?”

  • e.g. last I looked there were some 450+ meanings for “cc”
  • OAD offers under 12

13:06:40 Tony Cohn : Just FYI: regarding soil, I can point to one ontology: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-46547-0_4, and also the ground has an ontology in this paper: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0198971523000546?via%3Dihub
13:07:15 TS : To be able to assess semantic interoperability systematically the SCOPE model will use the following (generic) communication paths.

  • These paths include
    • People -to- People using natural languages, images, sound, physical gestures or contact
    • People -to- Machines: using natural languages, image, sounds or symbols translated (with potential content corruption) to (one or more) formal languages and representations
    • Machines -to- Machines: using formal languages and representations, images or symbols, perhaps with translations (with potential content corruption)
    • People -to- Machines -to- People: using natural languages, images, sounds or symbols to formal languages and representations, images or sounds and back to natural languages, images, sounds, or symbols with translations (with potential content corruption)
    • Machines -to- People: using formal languages, image, sounds, and symbols to natural languages, images, sounds, symbols or haptic mechanisms
  • David EDDY - Legacy Software, Ltd. 👍

13:08:06 David EDDY - Legacy Software, Ltd. : Thx Ken, et al
13:08:22 Phil Jackson : Thanks!
13:08:41 Jackie Csonka-Peeren : thank you!
13:08:41 Mike Peters : thanks
13:08:55 Edelweis Rohrer. : Thanks

Resources

Next Meetings

 Session
ConferenceCall 2026 02 25Retrospective
ConferenceCall 2026 03 04Ontologies and AI
ConferenceCall 2026 03 11Ontologies and AI
... further results