ConferenceCall 2023 06 14: Difference between revisions
Ontolog Forum
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
== Agenda == | == Agenda == | ||
* Communiqué Development | * Communiqué Development | ||
* [https://bit.ly/3JhMpAs Video Recording] | |||
== Conference Call Information == | == Conference Call Information == | ||
| Line 35: | Line 36: | ||
* [[GaryBergCross|Gary Berg-Cross]] | * [[GaryBergCross|Gary Berg-Cross]] | ||
* [[KenBaclawski|Ken Baclawski]] | * [[KenBaclawski|Ken Baclawski]] | ||
* [[ | * [[KurtConrad|Kurt Conrad]] | ||
* [[RamSriram|Ram D. Sriram]] | * [[RamSriram|Ram D. Sriram]] | ||
* [[RaviSharma|Ravi Sharma]] | * [[RaviSharma|Ravi Sharma]] | ||
| Line 41: | Line 42: | ||
== Discussion == | == Discussion == | ||
[12:30] Kurt Conrad: maturity models: | |||
* start w/ terminology | |||
* add relationships/taxonomies | |||
* start to formalize semantics | |||
* logical formalization | |||
[12:31] Kurt Conrad: referencing vs creating standardized concepts | |||
[12:34] Ravi Sharma: tool reasoners and results | |||
[12:37] Robert Rovetto: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2011/reference/ontologyMaturityModel-obrst-2009.pdf | |||
[12:50] Kurt Conrad: semantic formalization involves a range of approaches, from simple to complex characterization frameworks | |||
[12:54] Gary Berg-Cross: Here is what I wrote in Section 4 that touches on funding and maturity - "Within the engineering lifecycle adequate tool development and maintenance is still needed over time. This reflects in part a prototype problem as argued by Vigo, Matentzoglu, Jay & Stevens (2019). Too many ontology authoring tools remain prototypes that are not widely used by groups beyond a narrow domain scope. Tool maturation requires funding such as was the case for Protégé tooling." | |||
[12:55] Kurt Conrad: another dimension of "maturity": personal exploration or management support and funding | |||
[12:58] Robert Rovetto: https://www.researchgate.net/figure/The-four-phases-of-the-ontology-maturing-process-model_fig1_221467162 | |||
[12:59] Ravi Sharma: So we need to say something about maturity and Ram and Kurt and I will provide some inputs, Robert will add to lists and other comments, Gary said he will review some sections. | |||
[13:00] Robert Rovetto: https://www.researchgate.net/post/Is-there-a-maturity-model-for-ontologies | |||
[13:02] Ravi Sharma: Ken on progressions- phased projects, complexity and need for help? | |||
== Resources == | == Resources == | ||
* [https://bit.ly/3JhMpAs Video Recording] | |||
== Previous Meetings == | == Previous Meetings == | ||
Latest revision as of 15:48, 18 June 2023
| Session | Communiqué |
|---|---|
| Duration | 1 hour |
| Date/Time | 14 Jun 2023 16:00 GMT |
| 9:00am PDT/12:00pm EDT | |
| 4:00pm GMT/5:00pm CST | |
| Convener | Gary Berg-Cross |
Ontology Summit 2023 Communiqué
Helping scientific researchers make better use of ontologies
Agenda
- Communiqué Development
- Video Recording
Conference Call Information
- Date: Wednesday, 14 Jun 2023
- Start Time: 9:00am PDT / 12:00pm EDT / 6:00pm CEST / 5:00pm BST / 1600 UTC
- ref: World Clock
- Expected Call Duration: 1 hour
- Video Conference URL
- Conference ID: 837 8041 8377
- Passcode: 323309
- Chat Room
The unabbreviated URLs are:
- Conference URL: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/83780418377?pwd=MlRFTHJQclRBd3RhYVl3aG1rTHJOQT09
- Chat room: http://webconf.soaphub.org/conf/room/ontology_summit_2023
Link to draft synthesis document
Attendees
Discussion
[12:30] Kurt Conrad: maturity models:
- start w/ terminology
- add relationships/taxonomies
- start to formalize semantics
- logical formalization
[12:31] Kurt Conrad: referencing vs creating standardized concepts
[12:34] Ravi Sharma: tool reasoners and results
[12:37] Robert Rovetto: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2011/reference/ontologyMaturityModel-obrst-2009.pdf
[12:50] Kurt Conrad: semantic formalization involves a range of approaches, from simple to complex characterization frameworks
[12:54] Gary Berg-Cross: Here is what I wrote in Section 4 that touches on funding and maturity - "Within the engineering lifecycle adequate tool development and maintenance is still needed over time. This reflects in part a prototype problem as argued by Vigo, Matentzoglu, Jay & Stevens (2019). Too many ontology authoring tools remain prototypes that are not widely used by groups beyond a narrow domain scope. Tool maturation requires funding such as was the case for Protégé tooling."
[12:55] Kurt Conrad: another dimension of "maturity": personal exploration or management support and funding
[12:58] Robert Rovetto: https://www.researchgate.net/figure/The-four-phases-of-the-ontology-maturing-process-model_fig1_221467162
[12:59] Ravi Sharma: So we need to say something about maturity and Ram and Kurt and I will provide some inputs, Robert will add to lists and other comments, Gary said he will review some sections.
[13:00] Robert Rovetto: https://www.researchgate.net/post/Is-there-a-maturity-model-for-ontologies
[13:02] Ravi Sharma: Ken on progressions- phased projects, complexity and need for help?
Resources
Previous Meetings
| Session | |
|---|---|
| ConferenceCall 2023 04 26 | Synthesis |
| ConferenceCall 2023 04 19 | Ontology Development |
| ConferenceCall 2023 04 12 | Panel |
| ... further results | |
Next Meetings
| Session | |
|---|---|
| ConferenceCall 2023 06 07 | Communiqué |
| ConferenceCall 2023 06 14 | Communiqué |
| ConferenceCall 2023 06 21 | Communiqué |
| ... further results | |